Response Magazine Site Response Expo Site Direct Response Market Alliance Site Response TV Site Market Research Job Board
   Log in
  
The Voice

Recent News Demonstrates Robocalling Is on Regulators' Radar

6 Mar, 2012 By: Jeffrey D. Knowles, Mikhia E. Hawkins


On Feb. 15, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved significant changes to its rules regarding telemarketing calls. Among the changes was an update of the agency’s rules governing telemarketing “robocalls” – marketing phone calls that make use of an auto-dialer or artificial or prerecorded voice.

Both the FCC and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have regulatory enforcement authority over marketing telephone calls made to consumers. The FCC’s changes largely harmonize its telemarketing rules, which are enforced under authority granted by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), with the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The TSR requires, among other things, that marketers secure prior express written consent for all robocalls to wireless numbers and residential landlines, regardless of whether the calls are to consumers with whom the marketer has a business relationship. It also requires that marketers make automated “opt-out” mechanisms available to consumers that enable them to opt out of receiving future prerecorded calls from the marketer.

In addition, the FCC revised its rules to adopt a “per-calling-campaign” standard for measuring the maximum percentage of live telemarketing sales calls that a telemarketer may lawfully drop or abandon because of the use of autodialing software or other equipment. The agency had previously used a 30-day average of all a marketer’s calls to calculate the marketer’s abandon rate.

Demonstrating that the FTC is also paying attention to robocallers’ practices, the agency announced two settlements with marketers of robocalling technology on February 24. The two companies allegedly marketed Web-based self-service robocall platforms to businesses that enabled the services’ users to make prerecorded sales calls by uploading a recorded message and a list of telephone numbers. The Web-based service would then dial each uploaded phone number and play the uploaded prerecorded message.

The FTC alleged that the robocall service companies violated federal telemarketing laws by enabling telemarketing campaigns that unlawfully called numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, delivered prerecorded calls without complying with federal requirements for such calls, abandoned calls by playing prerecorded messages after call recipients answered the calls, and failed to disclose the caller’s identity during the calls. The companies’ robocall services allegedly used automated dialing equipment to deliver prerecorded messages.

The two settlements with the robocall self-service companies require that the businesses pay $10,000 to the FTC, with suspended civil penalty judgments of $2 million and $1 million, respectively. Additionally, the settlements prohibit the businesses from violating federal telemarketing laws in the future.

The changes to the FCC’s rules, as well as the recent FTC settlements, demonstrate that regulators are paying attention to the robocalling space. For marketers using robocalls, whether for lead generation, upselling existing clients, or any other reason, it is critical that they understand the regulations governing robocall-based marketing and develop best practices to ensure compliance with the state and federal rules regulating telemarketing.

Jeffrey D. Knowles is a partner at Venable LLP and chair of the firm’s Advertising, Marketing and New Media Group. Mikhia E. Hawkins is an attorney at Venable LLP. They can be reached at (202) 344-4000, or at jdknowles@venable.com and mhawkins@venable.com.


Add Comment



DRMA Spotlight
Google’s ‘Free Trial’ Advertisement Not a Binding Offer     4 Jun, 2013

Article By: Arthur Yoon, Jeffrey Richter

When can an advertisement be considered a binding offer? The U.S. District Court of Northern...More>>


18 Jun, 2013

Sater

June 4, 2013 | Article | By Gregory J. Sater

They say the best things in life are free, but are they free if you have to pay separate shipping... more>>


Roth_Marc0

June 4, 2013 | Article | By Marc Roth

Last month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced proposed changes to the Telemarketing... more>>


Rothbard

June 4, 2013 | Article | By William I. Rothbard

The Pentagon policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” helped keep gay servicemen in the U.S.... more>>


Richter

June 4, 2013 | Article | By Arthur Yoon, Jeffrey Richter

When can an advertisement be considered a binding offer? The U.S. District Court of Northern... more>>


Roth_Marc

May 7, 2013 | Article | By Marc Roth

Most marketers that sell products or services that either automatically renew or are delivered on a... more>>



InterMedia

May 1, 2013 | Article | By Thomas Haire

It’s been a challenging year for the direct response business, but the team at the Inter/Media... more>>


DRMA-Spotlight_Image_Monarch

April 1, 2013 | Article | By Thomas Haire

“We strive to bring the highest levels of profitability to our clients, while simultaneously... more>>


DRMA-Spotlight_Cannella

March 1, 2013 | Article | By Thomas Haire

“We’re trying to dispel some of the old misconceptions of what DRTV is, continue to support the... more>>


DRMA-Spotlight_Image_dial800

February 1, 2013 | Article | By Thomas Haire

Scott Richards, CEO of Los Angeles-based Dial800, doesn’t hesitate when asked how the company... more>>


DRMA-Spotlight_OpenJar0

January 16, 2013 | Article | By Thomas Haire

When it comes to servicing clients, we hold ourselves to the ‘Nordstrom’ standard,” says Adam... more>>


Content not yet available.


MOY

February 23, 2012 | News

Coming up on its fourth year, the DRMA Marketer of the Year Award is the most coveted award in the... more>>



June 18, 2013 | File

Case Study: Trust Guard - Stacks and Stacks more>>


April 17, 2012 | File

Rockwell Tools designs and manufactures a full line of corded and cordless power tools and... more>>