Recent News Demonstrates Robocalling Is on Regulators' Radar6 Mar, 2012 By: Jeffrey D. Knowles, Venable LLP’s Advertising, Mikhia E. Hawkins
On Feb. 15, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved significant changes to its rules regarding telemarketing calls. Among the changes was an update of the agency’s rules governing telemarketing “robocalls” – marketing phone calls that make use of an auto-dialer or artificial or prerecorded voice.
Both the FCC and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have regulatory enforcement authority over marketing telephone calls made to consumers. The FCC’s changes largely harmonize its telemarketing rules, which are enforced under authority granted by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), with the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The TSR requires, among other things, that marketers secure prior express written consent for all robocalls to wireless numbers and residential landlines, regardless of whether the calls are to consumers with whom the marketer has a business relationship. It also requires that marketers make automated “opt-out” mechanisms available to consumers that enable them to opt out of receiving future prerecorded calls from the marketer.
In addition, the FCC revised its rules to adopt a “per-calling-campaign” standard for measuring the maximum percentage of live telemarketing sales calls that a telemarketer may lawfully drop or abandon because of the use of autodialing software or other equipment. The agency had previously used a 30-day average of all a marketer’s calls to calculate the marketer’s abandon rate.
Demonstrating that the FTC is also paying attention to robocallers’ practices, the agency announced two settlements with marketers of robocalling technology on February 24. The two companies allegedly marketed Web-based self-service robocall platforms to businesses that enabled the services’ users to make prerecorded sales calls by uploading a recorded message and a list of telephone numbers. The Web-based service would then dial each uploaded phone number and play the uploaded prerecorded message.
The FTC alleged that the robocall service companies violated federal telemarketing laws by enabling telemarketing campaigns that unlawfully called numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, delivered prerecorded calls without complying with federal requirements for such calls, abandoned calls by playing prerecorded messages after call recipients answered the calls, and failed to disclose the caller’s identity during the calls. The companies’ robocall services allegedly used automated dialing equipment to deliver prerecorded messages.
The two settlements with the robocall self-service companies require that the businesses pay $10,000 to the FTC, with suspended civil penalty judgments of $2 million and $1 million, respectively. Additionally, the settlements prohibit the businesses from violating federal telemarketing laws in the future.
The changes to the FCC’s rules, as well as the recent FTC settlements, demonstrate that regulators are paying attention to the robocalling space. For marketers using robocalls, whether for lead generation, upselling existing clients, or any other reason, it is critical that they understand the regulations governing robocall-based marketing and develop best practices to ensure compliance with the state and federal rules regulating telemarketing.
Jeffrey D. Knowles is a partner at Venable LLP and chair of the firm’s Advertising, Marketing and New Media Group. Mikhia E. Hawkins is an attorney at Venable LLP. They can be reached at (202) 344-4000, or at [email protected] and [email protected].
|White Paper: Media Corps - What You Must Know|
|Case Study: AVC Corp - Theft-Preventive Packaging|
|Case Study: PlusOne Company – Greatest Profession|
|FTC Suffers Another Setback in RCT Crusade 3 Nov, 2015|
|What the FTC’s Win in Wyndham May Mean for Marketers 3 Nov, 2015|
|It Was an Interesting Month for Telemarketers 3 Nov, 2015|
|The Risks and Rules of Auto-Renewal 13 Oct, 2015|
|FTC Says You Can’t ‘Gag’ Truthful Negative Consumer Reviews 13 Oct, 2015|
|Fantasy Sports Challenges Could Hurt Networks 25 Nov, 2015|
|Comcast’s New Streaming Service Riles Neutrality Advocates 25 Nov, 2015|
|OTT Services to Reach 306 Million by 2020 25 Nov, 2015|
|Vizio and Vendors Face Lawsuit Over Tracking Viewers 25 Nov, 2015|
|AT&T Looks to End Throttling Case in Appeals Court 25 Nov, 2015|
|DRMA Spotlight: 30 Years in, Cannella Response Television Keeps Looking Ahead 1 Oct, 2015|
|Membership Director - American Nurses Association - Silver Spring, MD|
|The Director of Membership is responsible for creating and operationalizing an association membership growth strategy that aligns with ANA?s strategic goals. The incumbent is responsible for driving the development, implementation and evaluation of membership growth strategies; establishing priorities, ...|
|IS Data Analyst - Brigham and Women's Hospital - Boston, MA|
|The IS Data Analyst works directly with the fundraising staff to provide front line decision support services, including report development and analysis, applications support, list management, and other services related to the information systems used by the Development Office.PRINCIPAL DUTIES ...|
|Director of Business Development - REVShare - Temecula, CA|
|POSITION TITLE: Director of Business DevelopmentREPORTING TO: Chief Revenue Officer, Direct Response, Shannon NelsonLOCATION: Temecula, CA / Anywhere USACOMPANY: REVShare, a division of Media Properties Holdings Incorporated (MPH) www.revshare.comMedia Properties Holdings manages and owns ...|
|Marketing Assistant - National Safety Council - Itasca, IL|
|The Marketing Associate will assist with the execution and coordination of marketing plans that result in increased brand awareness, brand equity, member value and non-dues revenue for the National Safety Council. Working with the Business Units and the Circulation Planner and Analyst, this individual ...|