Response Magazine Site Response Expo Site Direct Response Market Alliance Site Job Board

 

   Log in
  
The Voice

Nutella Case Speaks to Limits on Scope of Class Actions

6 Mar, 2012 By: Jeffrey Richter, John Waller, Blank Rome LLP


As noted in the December 2011 issue of the DRMA Voice, the marketer of Nutella recently succeeded in substantially limiting the size of the proposed putative class of purchasers of its product by arguing that not everyone in the proposed class had been exposed to the alleged misrepresentation. An equally important lesson to be gleaned from this case is that nationwide marketers who find themselves sued for alleged violations of a single state’s unfair competition laws need not necessarily fear that they will always need to defend their conduct in a nationwide class action based upon that single state’s unfair competition laws.

In the In re Ferrero case, the plaintiffs sought to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella who had allegedly been exposed to misleading labeling and advertising about the benefits of consuming Nutella. The plaintiffs alleged that the marketer promoted Nutella as being healthy and beneficial to children despite its high levels of fat and sugar.

The named class representatives were all California residents who viewed the advertisements for Nutella in California and thereafter purchased Nutella in California. No doubt seeking to take advantage of California’s consumer-favorable unfair competition laws and desiring to maximize the size of the putative class, the plaintiffs asked the court to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella and to apply California’s unfair competition laws to the entire class.

Although the court concluded that it was appropriate to certify a class consisting solely of California-based purchasers of Nutella, it refused to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella notwithstanding that the same advertisements and label were used throughout the United States. The court noted that the plaintiffs made no showing that non-California purchasers saw the allegedly misleading advertising for Nutella in California, purchased Nutella in California, or that their claims arose out of conduct that occurred in California. The court, following established precedent that California’s unfair competition laws embody a presumption that they do not apply to conduct occurring outside of California, concluded that it was not appropriate to apply California’s unfair competition statutes to non-California residents in this case.

Although nationwide marketers may not always be as fortunate as the marketer of Nutella in limiting the scope of the putative classes that they face to consumers located in a single state – and may occasionally desire to resolve all potential claims about their products or the advertising or labeling therefore in a single lawsuit rather than in multiple lawsuits – the Nutella case is a good reminder that even marketers that run the same advertisements nationwide need not always fear that a single state’s laws will be applied to their conduct nationwide. Although the Nutella decision was based upon specific case law interpreting California’s unfair competition statutes, if faced with an attempt by an artful plaintiff to apply one state’s laws to residents of other states, carefully review the applicability of that state’s laws to residents of other states before assuming and accepting that they are correct. 

Jeffrey Richter and John Waller are partners at Los Angeles-based Finestone & Richter. They can be reached at (310) 575-0800, or at jrichter@frlawcorp.com and jwaller@frlawcorp.com.


Add Comment

DRMA Putting Unity in Community


The DRMA is vibrant and growing marketing alliance with one singular focus: to serve and support marketing professionals that utilize performance-based, trackable and measurable marketing.

If you are responsible for a product or service that is sold and marketed to a consumer via direct response, digital or data-driven tactics, or if you are part of the supply chain that helps facilitate a marketing and sales campaign, then the DRMA is a vital organization to join.

The DRMA uses a combination of education and networking to foster clear channels of communication and transparent pathways to nurture long term relationships in a comfortable and neutral environment.



DRMA Voice
Warner Bros. Settles FTC Charges It Failed to Adequately Disclose Payments to Online Influencers     9 Aug, 2016

Article By: Adam Z. Solomon

More brands are paying online “influencers” to engage with, positively review, and market their...More>>

This Summer, Don’t Reach for the Rings     9 Aug, 2016

Article By: Jeffrey D. Knowles, Po Yi, Jessica Borowick

For a marketer, the Olympics are an almost irresistible opportunity to build brand awareness and...More>>

7-Eleven May Be Liable for Mislabeling Food Packages     9 Aug, 2016

Article By: Jeffrey Richter, Arthur Yoon

Scott Bishop (plaintiff), a consumer of 7-Eleven brand potato chips, initiated a class action...More>>

Supreme Court Hands TCPA and Privacy Defendants a Gift     12 Jul, 2016

Article By: William I. Rothbard

The U.S. Supreme Court handed telemarketing and privacy defendants a nice gift in May. In Spokeo...More>>

Misplaced Modifiers?     12 Jul, 2016

Article By: Jeffrey Richter

The hottest buzzword in food production is an abbreviation: GMO, which stands for genetically...More>>


Breaking News
July TV Results Show a Mix of Gains and Losses     24 Aug, 2016

News By: Doug McPherson

NEW YORK – TV in July was a mixed bag, according to results from various researchers.More>>

T-Mobile in Hot Water Over Slowed Hotspots     24 Aug, 2016

News By: Doug McPherson

BELLEVUE, Wash. – T-Mobile’s new version of its unlimited data plan, dubbed T-Mobile One, is...More>>

Sprint Ads Draw BBB Ad Group’s Attention     24 Aug, 2016

News By: Doug McPherson

WASHINGTON – The National Advertising Division (NAD), a unit of the Better Business Bureau, has...More>>

Mozilla Supports New Cable Box Rules     24 Aug, 2016

News By: Doug McPherson

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – Browser developer Mozilla is supporting the proposed new set-top-box...More>>

Brite-Strike, TELEBrands Sue Emson Products For Patent Infringement     24 Aug, 2016

News By: Doug McPherson

BOSTON – Brite-Strike Technologies Inc. and its licensee, TELEBrands Corp. – marketers of the...More>>


DRMA Spotlight
DRMA Spotlight: Not Toying With Your Business     1 Aug, 2016

Article By: Thomas Haire

“When we take on a new client, we have a holistic approach to designing a solution that will fit...More>>