Nutella Case Speaks to Limits on Scope of Class Actions6 Mar, 2012 By: Jeffrey Richter, John Waller, Blank Rome LLP
As noted in the December 2011 issue of the DRMA Voice, the marketer of Nutella recently succeeded in substantially limiting the size of the proposed putative class of purchasers of its product by arguing that not everyone in the proposed class had been exposed to the alleged misrepresentation. An equally important lesson to be gleaned from this case is that nationwide marketers who find themselves sued for alleged violations of a single state’s unfair competition laws need not necessarily fear that they will always need to defend their conduct in a nationwide class action based upon that single state’s unfair competition laws.
In the In re Ferrero case, the plaintiffs sought to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella who had allegedly been exposed to misleading labeling and advertising about the benefits of consuming Nutella. The plaintiffs alleged that the marketer promoted Nutella as being healthy and beneficial to children despite its high levels of fat and sugar.
The named class representatives were all California residents who viewed the advertisements for Nutella in California and thereafter purchased Nutella in California. No doubt seeking to take advantage of California’s consumer-favorable unfair competition laws and desiring to maximize the size of the putative class, the plaintiffs asked the court to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella and to apply California’s unfair competition laws to the entire class.
Although the court concluded that it was appropriate to certify a class consisting solely of California-based purchasers of Nutella, it refused to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella notwithstanding that the same advertisements and label were used throughout the United States. The court noted that the plaintiffs made no showing that non-California purchasers saw the allegedly misleading advertising for Nutella in California, purchased Nutella in California, or that their claims arose out of conduct that occurred in California. The court, following established precedent that California’s unfair competition laws embody a presumption that they do not apply to conduct occurring outside of California, concluded that it was not appropriate to apply California’s unfair competition statutes to non-California residents in this case.
Although nationwide marketers may not always be as fortunate as the marketer of Nutella in limiting the scope of the putative classes that they face to consumers located in a single state – and may occasionally desire to resolve all potential claims about their products or the advertising or labeling therefore in a single lawsuit rather than in multiple lawsuits – the Nutella case is a good reminder that even marketers that run the same advertisements nationwide need not always fear that a single state’s laws will be applied to their conduct nationwide. Although the Nutella decision was based upon specific case law interpreting California’s unfair competition statutes, if faced with an attempt by an artful plaintiff to apply one state’s laws to residents of other states, carefully review the applicability of that state’s laws to residents of other states before assuming and accepting that they are correct.
|Case Study: Marketing Architects - Leads Somnetics International With CPAP Campaign|
|White Paper: InterMedia Advertising - The 2016 Political Advertising Environment|
|Case Study: InterMedia Advertising - POV Series: Optimization|
|Supreme Court Hands TCPA and Privacy Defendants a Gift 12 Jul, 2016|
|Misplaced Modifiers? 12 Jul, 2016|
|In Case of Negotiation Breakdown, Always Be Trial Ready 12 Jul, 2016|
|FTC Scores Big Win Against Amazon in Kids’ Apps ‘Unfairness’ Case 7 Jun, 2016|
|Antitrust vs. Anti-Trump: The Donald’s Feud With Amazon 7 Jun, 2016|
|Unilever’s Dollar Shave Club Purchase Could Spawn More Deals 27 Jul, 2016|
|Ad Industry Abuzz About Yahoo-Verizon Deal 27 Jul, 2016|
|Programmatic TV Spending to Rise in 2017; AOL Invests $500M 27 Jul, 2016|
|Time Warner, Viacom, A&E Slash Commercial Time 27 Jul, 2016|
|New DRMA Committees Welcome 40 Industry Leaders 27 Jul, 2016|
|Online Marketing Specialist, Traffic Acquisition - SmarterTravel - Boston, MA|
|Why this role is awesome:You?ll use your strong online marketing experience to drive traffic acquisition for the Smarter Traveler business. You have at least 1 year experience of direct response marketing.You will create opportunities, both for the company and for yourself.In this role, you WILL ...|
|Direct Response Marketing VP - Ideal Living - Sherman Oaks, CA|
|Job purposeMarketing VP is responsible for developing, implementing and executing strategic marketing plans for dedicated Ideal Living brands in order to attract new/potential customers and retain existing ones.Job Posting for advertisement seeking Marketing VPJob Posting: We are an exciting, ...|
|Membership Communications Designer - The Nature Conservancy - Arlington, VA|
|OFFICE LOCATIONArlington, Virginia (VA)POSITION SUMMARYThe Membership Communications Designer manages and implements creative projects that advance Membership?s fundraising and marketing strategies. S/he is directly responsible for projects and managing project budgets.ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONSThe Membership ...|
|Sales - Order Fulfillment and Contact Center - a2b Fulfillment - Greensboro, GA|
|a2b Fulfillment, located in Greensboro, GA is a fast-growing provider of third-party logistics and business support services. We are currently seeking a Sales Professional that possesses the skills to sell complex, business support services to medium, and large organizations. This position offers ...|
|Media Operations Supervisor - Modus Direct - Sarasota, FL|
|Job Purpose:The Operations Coordinator will be responsible for traffic, data entry and management, new campaign setup, and support the Account and Media teams in reporting functions. Working with the management team, the position also contributes to the development and implementation of operational ...|