Nutella Case Speaks to Limits on Scope of Class Actions6 Mar, 2012 By: Jeffrey Richter, John Waller, Blank Rome LLP
As noted in the December 2011 issue of the DRMA Voice, the marketer of Nutella recently succeeded in substantially limiting the size of the proposed putative class of purchasers of its product by arguing that not everyone in the proposed class had been exposed to the alleged misrepresentation. An equally important lesson to be gleaned from this case is that nationwide marketers who find themselves sued for alleged violations of a single state’s unfair competition laws need not necessarily fear that they will always need to defend their conduct in a nationwide class action based upon that single state’s unfair competition laws.
In the In re Ferrero case, the plaintiffs sought to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella who had allegedly been exposed to misleading labeling and advertising about the benefits of consuming Nutella. The plaintiffs alleged that the marketer promoted Nutella as being healthy and beneficial to children despite its high levels of fat and sugar.
The named class representatives were all California residents who viewed the advertisements for Nutella in California and thereafter purchased Nutella in California. No doubt seeking to take advantage of California’s consumer-favorable unfair competition laws and desiring to maximize the size of the putative class, the plaintiffs asked the court to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella and to apply California’s unfair competition laws to the entire class.
Although the court concluded that it was appropriate to certify a class consisting solely of California-based purchasers of Nutella, it refused to certify a nationwide class of purchasers of Nutella notwithstanding that the same advertisements and label were used throughout the United States. The court noted that the plaintiffs made no showing that non-California purchasers saw the allegedly misleading advertising for Nutella in California, purchased Nutella in California, or that their claims arose out of conduct that occurred in California. The court, following established precedent that California’s unfair competition laws embody a presumption that they do not apply to conduct occurring outside of California, concluded that it was not appropriate to apply California’s unfair competition statutes to non-California residents in this case.
Although nationwide marketers may not always be as fortunate as the marketer of Nutella in limiting the scope of the putative classes that they face to consumers located in a single state – and may occasionally desire to resolve all potential claims about their products or the advertising or labeling therefore in a single lawsuit rather than in multiple lawsuits – the Nutella case is a good reminder that even marketers that run the same advertisements nationwide need not always fear that a single state’s laws will be applied to their conduct nationwide. Although the Nutella decision was based upon specific case law interpreting California’s unfair competition statutes, if faced with an attempt by an artful plaintiff to apply one state’s laws to residents of other states, carefully review the applicability of that state’s laws to residents of other states before assuming and accepting that they are correct.
|Case Study: Shopper Approved Gives Peace of Mind to FTD|
|Case Study: Mojo - Mojo Helps My Shiney Hiney Bring Sexy Back|
|Case Study: Fosina - The Importance of the Customer Value Proposition|
|Don’t Let Your Ads Foul Out 14 Mar, 2017|
|Protecting Against Product Liability Actions 14 Mar, 2017|
|The Quandary in TV’s Advertising Evolution 14 Mar, 2017|
|Face Time Beats ‘FaceTime’ … Every Time 14 Mar, 2017|
|‘E.T. Phone Home!’ The Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Marketing 14 Mar, 2017|
|DRMA Spotlight: Helping Clients and Employees Reach Their Dreams 1 Mar, 2017|
|Full Stack Developer, Data Science Department - Unison - San Francisco, CA|
|Unison offers:An opportunity to be a leadership role in the engineering team that is driving significant value Lots of green field to build new systems from scratch Some existing systems that are in production and provide a stable platform for rapid improvement A culture of analytically minded ...|
|Associate Director of Development - Johns Hopkins University - Baltimore, MD|
|Range: PD Level: 4 Status: Full Time School: University Administration Location: Homewood Campus General Description:The Associate Director of Development will build and advance relationships to drive philanthropy from undergraduate alumni through prospect identification, cultivation, solicitation, ...|
|Direct Marketing Copywriter - American Immigration Lawyers Association - Washington, DC|
|The National Office of the American Immigration Lawyers Association(AILA) seeks an experienced direct marketing copywriter to support the execution of marketing initiatives, think strategically about targeted messaging, and write persuasive marketing collateral across multiple channels.Our Workplace ...|
|Business Development - J. Rosen Group - Los Angeles, CA|
|Seeking a fearless go-getter to establish leads and land new accounts for national advertising/media agency. The right person will source and qualify potential leads, close them and if needed hand them off to the companies VP to close. Base plus commission will be offered. Opportunity to make ...|
|Project Manager #12761 - The Davey Tree Expert Company - Kent, OH|
|PROJECT MANAGER: DIRECT RESPONSE MARKETING As the oldest and largest tree care company in the U.S., Davey has a rich heritage of scientific and environmental leadership. We are looking for a project manager to manage and execute specific direct response marketing programs. The ideal ...|