FTC Orders Super-Policing of Affiliates6 Mar, 2012 By: William I. Rothbard
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) continues to define the scope of online affiliate monitoring obligations. Last year, in Legacy Learning Systems, the FTC ordered a merchant, that was paying affiliates to post favorable product reviews without disclosure of the financial tie, to: monitor and report to the FTC about its top 50 money-making affiliates and ensure they are making the financial connection disclosure; monitor and report on a random sampling of another 50 affiliates to ensure they also disclose the connection; and terminate and stop payment to any non-complying affiliate.
This year, the FTC has laid out further its vision of compliant affiliate monitoring in much-awaited settlements of two big Internet marketing cases: Central Coast Nutraceuticals and 1021018 Alberta Ltd., d.b.a. Just Think Media and their respective head honchos, Graham Gibson and Jesse Willms. Gibson and Willms both were engaged in negative option marketing through affiliate programs. In addition to banning them for life from using negative options (a now standard FTC remedy), the FTC orders against Gibson and Willms impose super tough affiliate policing requirements that amount to a de facto ban on affiliate marketing because there is no way they can be satisfied, at least on a large scale.
The Gibson and Willms orders require one or the other of them to:
• Obtain the full name, physical address, E-mail address, phone number and bank account of every affiliate
• Provide each affiliate and affiliate network a copy of their FTC order and obtain a signed statement acknowledging its receipt
• Inform each affiliate and network that engaging in conduct prohibited by the order will result in immediate termination and forfeiture of all monies owed the affiliate
• Require each affiliate or network, prior to the use of any marketing materials, to provide all marketing materials, the URL location for the materials, the URL of any hyperlink contained in the materials, and the range of date the materials will run
• Review all marketing materials for compliance and, if they don’t comply, inform the affiliate or network that approval is denied and no payment will be made for sales coming from those materials
• Thoroughly investigate any complaint against an affiliate or network
• Immediately terminate and stop paying any affiliate or network who they learn is violating the order
• Refund, within 5 business days, each consumer whose sale came from a non-compliant affiliate or network
On the surface, these requirements don’t seem particularly unreasonable. What’s wrong with getting affiliates’ addresses and making sure they use truthful ads? Online merchants, however, often work with hundreds of affiliates, or with networks consisting of hundreds or thousands of sub-affiliates, many dispersed on far-away continents. Affiliate ads can be changed in a keystroke, making monitoring of their every iteration impossible.
Faced with such obligations applicable to globe-spanning networks (including the refund liability), why would Gibson or Willms, or any merchant, want to engage in affiliate marketing? The obvious answer (if they’re sane) is, they wouldn’t.
Affiliate misconduct occurs, and the FTC has a legitimate interest in encouraging and, where necessary, forcing merchants and networks to make reasonable efforts to deter it. Prompt termination of known bad actors is appropriate and should be required, as in Legacy Learning. The super-policing ordered in these cases, however, is, as a practical matter, impossible for any merchant, even the most compliance-conscious, to carry out, at least on any sizable scale.
Rather than pretending Gibson and Willms could still engage in affiliate marketing if they would “just comply” with these requirements, it would have been more honest for the FTC to ban them altogether. And if these policing duties are what the FTC expects of all online merchants and affiliate networks, then the FTC should be even more direct and just announce a complete ban on affiliate marketing by everyone.
William I. Rothbard is a former FTC attorney and practices in Los Angeles, specializing in advertising and marketing law. He can be reached at (310) 453-8713, Rothbard@FTCAdLaw.com, and www.ftcadlaw.com.
|DRMA Spotlight: Processing the Right Answers for Clients 1 Mar, 2015|
April 7, 2015 | Article | By William I. Rothbard
In “Does The FTC Have Legal Authority Over Affiliate Networks?” (DRMA Voice, July 2014), I... more>>
April 7, 2015 | Article | By Rachel Hirsch
It is no secret that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enjoys flexing its enforcement muscle... more>>
April 7, 2015 | Article | By Gregory J. Sater
Last month, in a putative class action lawsuit against Guthy-Renker, a federal court judge in Los... more>>
April 7, 2015 | Article | By Marc Roth
Marketers that believe they can use certain exemptions under the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) to... more>>
March 3, 2015 | Article | By Marc Roth
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has again let industry know that it is very much on the beat... more>>
March 1, 2015 | Article | By Thomas Haire
It’s been more than two years since we turned the Direct Response Marketing Alliance (DRMA)... more>>
November 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
In January 2013, we turned the Direct Response Marketing Alliance (DRMA) Spotlight on Temecula,... more>>
October 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
“We’ve always been innovators in the industry — we’ve disrupted it a few times,” says Rob... more>>
September 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
O2 Media is a fully integrated media and television production company, based in Pompano Beach,... more>>
August 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
“When Rob Albert and I formed Grand Slam Direct, we didn’t want to be just another production... more>>
April 16, 2015 | File
March 2, 2015 | File
Higher Power Marketing: Conversion Rates So Good They’re (Almost) Unheard Of more>>
February 13, 2015 | File
Higher Power Marketing: We Gave Them the Power to Buy Media in Any Market more>>
December 8, 2014 | File
The Illusion Factory: Interactive Campaigns Supporting the Release of the CW Network’s “The... more>>
August 8, 2014 | File
|Associate Director-Integrated Marketing, Women's Health - Rodale - New York, NY|
|Rodale is seeking an associate director of integrated marketing to work in our New York-based Marketing Department for Women's Health. The overall goal of the Associate Director position is to write merchandising proposals and marketing presentations that will help attract, maintain and increase ...|
|Senior Vice President, Consumer Marketing & Audience Development - Star Tribune Media Company - Minneapolis, MN|
|Star Tribune Media Company is looking for a Senior Vice President, Consumer Marketing & Audience Development to lead consumer marketing for Star Tribune across digital and print platforms. Reporting to the Publisher, the SVP will provide vision and focus to drive revenue and audience growth across ...|
|Content Associate - Cappex - Chicago|
|Cappex is a growing and successful small company with a great mission--to help and connect students and colleges--6 million+ high school students have used Cappex and we have more than 650 college clients! Cappex was named as one of the Top 100 Digital companies in Chicago by BuiltInChicago.org. ...|
|Account Executive - DirectAvenue, Inc. - Carlsbad, CA|
|Account ExecutiveThis position requires him or her to hold industry knowledge and perform all duties as the Subject Matter Expert (SME) pertaining to the Media Buying Industry and all Media Properties; specifically Short Form DRTV in the following markets: Cable, Syndication, Network & Regional/Local ...|
|Director of Direct Response Marketing & Media - Actegy Health Inc - Indianapolis, IN|
|Opportunity to launch in the US a successful international organizationSky?s the limit ? make this your career crowning achievement! The OpportunityYou have demonstrated success building and managing profitable DRTV campaigns for branded consumer products and want to put your knowledge and skills ...|