FTC Loses Contempt Action Against Garden of Life6 Mar, 2012 By: Linda A. Goldstein
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suffered a striking loss in its efforts to hold Garden of Life, the marketer of various dietary supplements, in contempt of a previous consent order entered into by the company with the FTC in 2006.
The FTC alleged that Garden of Life violated the order by: falsely claiming that its Raw Vitamin C, Raw Calcium and Grow Bone System contained no soy allergens; making baseless claims that its Ocean Kids Omega 3 product has brain boosting powers and other benefits for children; and making unfounded claims that RAW Calcium and Grow Bone System are superior to other calcium supplements. The court ruled that the FTC had failed to prove that any of the challenged claims violated the previous consent order. There are a number of fascinating highlights from the case that should be of interest to every DR marketer.
First, the court expressly stated at the outset of the decision that in order for a defendant to be held in contempt of an order, the order must be clear, definite and unambiguous. While the court did not in this case ultimately need to address the issue of whether the original Garden of Life consent order was sufficiently clear and unambiguous, its warning on this issue is likely to fuel the FTC’s current efforts to move away from the more general “competent and reliable scientific evidence” substantiation standard to a more specific requirement that certain claims be supported by one or more clinical studies.
Secondly, the Court’s analysis of the “no soy allergen” claim should be music to the ears of marketers who routinely rely upon their suppliers for their ingredient claims. Garden of Life defended this claim by arguing that it was not the manufacturer of the product, and that it had been assured by the manufacturer that the product did not contain any allergens. The court agreed with Garden of Life and expressly ruled that the allergen statements, prepared by the manufacturer, constitute “competent and reliable scientific evidence.”
The court’s approach to the Ocean Kids Omega 3 product claims is particularly noteworthy. The FTC will often retain its own experts to critique a defendant’s studies or to contradict the expert opinions upon which a defendant has relied, and the courts have historically given great deference to the FTC’s experts. In this case, the Court ruled that simply because the FTC’s expert disagreed with Garden of Life’s expert on certain aspects of a study’s trial design does not mean that Garden of Life’s expert opinion did not constitute competent and reliable scientific evidence.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case involved the FTC’s challenge to alleged claims by Garden of Life that its Raw Calcium and Grow Bone System offered superior health benefits to other calcium supplements. The court took a very narrow view of the existing consent order. The order provision at issue prohibited Garden of Life from making representations about the “absolute or comparative health benefits of its products.” The court determined that this provision only applied to claims about the health benefits of Garden of Life products or to claims that individuals who use Garden of Life products would achieve certain benefits compared to those who do not use the product. In the court’s view, the FTC’s interpretation of the order provision in question was not a sufficiently tailored interpretation of the injunctive provisions of the consent decree. The court further determined that even if the FTC’s interpretation of the order provision was correct, it had taken Garden of Life’s claims out of context, and the advertising was not making the claims that the FTC had alleged.
This decision will likely have an impact on FTC order provisions in the future, but for those facing initial enforcement actions or contempt proceedings, the court’s analysis and decision certainly provides some useful precedent.
Linda Goldstein is chair of the Advertising, Marketing and Media division of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, based in the firm’s New York office. She can be reached at (212) 790-4544 or email@example.com.
|DRMA Spotlight: O2 Media Seeks a New Level of Excellence 1 Sep, 2014|
September 9, 2014 | Article | By Jeffrey D. Knowles, Leonard L. Gordon
If the beginning of football season were a holiday (and we know it is for some of you), it would... more>>
September 9, 2014 | Article | By William I. Rothbard
We think of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as an anti-deception agency, and it is just that.... more>>
September 9, 2014 | Article | By Frank R. Fasel
Just about every employer in California, big or small, will encounter the state’s dreaded Labor... more>>
September 9, 2014 | Article | By Ana Tagvoryan, Joshua Briones
Online service providers often collect user data in various forms for statistical or marketing... more>>
September 9, 2014 | Article | By Marc Roth
During the summer, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued what many in the direct response... more>>
September 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
O2 Media is a fully integrated media and television production company, based in Pompano Beach,... more>>
August 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
“When Rob Albert and I formed Grand Slam Direct, we didn’t want to be just another production... more>>
July 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
Vantiv, based in Symmes Township, Ohio — with offices in Dallas, Houston, Louisville, Tinley... more>>
April 1, 2014 | Article | By Thomas Haire
Higher Power Marketing is a Phoenix-based per-inquiry (PI) advertising agency and Direct Response... more>>
April 1, 2014 | Article | By Doug McPherson
“In the beginning it was just me in my apartment on my couch with a laptop and $400 cash,” says... more>>
|Content not yet available.|
August 8, 2014 | File
August 8, 2014 | File
July 15, 2014 | File
July 15, 2014 | File
July 15, 2014 | File
|Manager Brand Card Customer Management - Capital One - Richmond, VA|
|Manager, Brand Card Customer ManagementCompany and Department Overview At Capital One, we think big and do big things. We were the first company to develop and offer mass customization and personalization of credit card products, and we have been innovating relentlessly ever since. Today we are ...|
|Director of Development, Class Giving (0464U-Fundraising Manager 1) - University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley, CA|
|Director of Development, Class Giving (0464U-Fundraising Manager 1) #18552UC Berkeley - Main CampusThe University of California, Berkeley, is one of the worlds most iconic teaching and research institutions. Since 1868, Berkeley has fueled a perpetual renaissance, generating unparalleled intellectual, ...|
|PI/DR Manager - Suddenlink Communications - College Station, TX|
|JOB SUMMARY High powered sales executive, responsible for growing $4 Million Per Inquiry and Direct Response channels by meeting and exceeding revenue goals via pricing, packaging and inventory control with thorough knowledge of the market, the competition and clients marketing needs. Collaborates ...|
|Membership Assistant - Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine - Washington, DC|
|About the Physicians Committee Who We AreThe Physicians Committee is a nonprofit organization working toward compassionate and effective medical practice, research, and health promotion. Since 1985, the Physicians Committee has led the way for reforms of federal nutrition policies, and our clinical ...|
|Brand Manager Direct Mail Communications - Capital One - Richmond, VA|
|Manager, Direct Mail CommunicationsUS Card Acquisitions Capital One, a Fortune Magazine “100 Best Companies to Work For,” is seeking a Marketing Manager to lead direct response marketing for Upmarket and Small Business. This high-profile marketing role is responsible for leading a ...|