Response Magazine Site Response Expo Site Direct Response Market Alliance Site Job Board

 

   Log in
  
The Voice

FTC Loses Contempt Action Against Garden of Life

6 Mar, 2012 By: Linda A. Goldstein


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suffered a striking loss in its efforts to hold Garden of Life, the marketer of various dietary supplements, in contempt of a previous consent order entered into by the company with the FTC in 2006.

The FTC alleged that Garden of Life violated the order by: falsely claiming that its Raw Vitamin C, Raw Calcium and Grow Bone System contained no soy allergens; making baseless claims that its Ocean Kids Omega 3 product has brain boosting powers and other benefits for children; and making unfounded claims that RAW Calcium and Grow Bone System are superior to other calcium supplements. The court ruled that the FTC had failed to prove that any of the challenged claims violated the previous consent order. There are a number of fascinating highlights from the case that should be of interest to every DR marketer.

First, the court expressly stated at the outset of the decision that in order for a defendant to be held in contempt of an order, the order must be clear, definite and unambiguous. While the court did not in this case ultimately need to address the issue of whether the original Garden of Life consent order was sufficiently clear and unambiguous, its warning on this issue is likely to fuel the FTC’s current efforts to move away from the more general “competent and reliable scientific evidence” substantiation standard to a more specific requirement that certain claims be supported by one or more clinical studies.

Secondly, the Court’s analysis of the “no soy allergen” claim should be music to the ears of marketers who routinely rely upon their suppliers for their ingredient claims. Garden of Life defended this claim by arguing that it was not the manufacturer of the product, and that it had been assured by the manufacturer that the product did not contain any allergens. The court agreed with Garden of Life and expressly ruled that the allergen statements, prepared by the manufacturer, constitute “competent and reliable scientific evidence.”

The court’s approach to the Ocean Kids Omega 3 product claims is particularly noteworthy. The FTC will often retain its own experts to critique a defendant’s studies or to contradict the expert opinions upon which a defendant has relied, and the courts have historically given great deference to the FTC’s experts. In this case, the Court ruled that simply because the FTC’s expert disagreed with Garden of Life’s expert on certain aspects of a study’s trial design does not mean that Garden of Life’s expert opinion did not constitute competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case involved the FTC’s challenge to alleged claims by Garden of Life that its Raw Calcium and Grow Bone System offered superior health benefits to other calcium supplements. The court took a very narrow view of the existing consent order. The order provision at issue prohibited Garden of Life from making representations about the “absolute or comparative health benefits of its products.” The court determined that this provision only applied to claims about the health benefits of Garden of Life products or to claims that individuals who use Garden of Life products would achieve certain benefits compared to those who do not use the product. In the court’s view, the FTC’s interpretation of the order provision in question was not a sufficiently tailored interpretation of the injunctive provisions of the consent decree. The court further determined that even if the FTC’s interpretation of the order provision was correct, it had taken Garden of Life’s claims out of context, and the advertising was not making the claims that the FTC had alleged.

This decision will likely have an impact on FTC order provisions in the future, but for those facing initial enforcement actions or contempt proceedings, the court’s analysis and decision certainly provides some useful precedent.

Linda Goldstein is chair of the Advertising, Marketing and Media division of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, based in the firm’s New York office. She can be reached at (212) 790-4544 or lgoldstein@manatt.com.


Add Comment

DRMA Putting Unity in Community


The DRMA is vibrant and growing marketing alliance with one singular focus: to serve and support marketing professionals that utilize performance-based, trackable and measurable marketing.

If you are responsible for a product or service that is sold and marketed to a consumer via direct response, digital or data-driven tactics, or if you are part of the supply chain that helps facilitate a marketing and sales campaign, then the DRMA is a vital organization to join.

The DRMA uses a combination of education and networking to foster clear channels of communication and transparent pathways to nurture long term relationships in a comfortable and neutral environment.



DRMA Voice
Don’t Let Your Ads Foul Out     14 Mar, 2017

Article By: Roger A. Colaizzi, Christopher S. Crook, Taylor G. Sachs

March is upon us, which means it is time for the madness to begin. Every year at this time, the...More>>

Protecting Against Product Liability Actions     14 Mar, 2017

Article By: Frank R. Fasel

When starting a business, your top priority should be to ensure that your product is safe from any...More>>

The Quandary in TV’s Advertising Evolution     14 Mar, 2017

Article By: Doug Garnett

“There are two kinds of fools. One says, ‘This is old, therefore it is good’; the other says,...More>>

Face Time Beats ‘FaceTime’ … Every Time     14 Mar, 2017

Article By: Andie Aronow

It’s March 2017, and we live and work in a world where most of us are inextricably glued to our...More>>

‘E.T. Phone Home!’ The Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Marketing     14 Mar, 2017

Article By: Lori H. Zeller

To prevent serious error and catastrophic leadership missteps, the chief marketing officer (CMO) of...More>>


Breaking News
Ad Exodus: Big Brands Continue to Pull Ads from YouTube     29 Mar, 2017

News By: Doug McPherson

SAN FRANCISCO – Several big-name brands and marketers continue to pull their ads from YouTube and...More>>

Marketing Groups Praise Senate Vote to Let ISPs Sell Consumer Data Without Consent     29 Mar, 2017

News By: Doug McPherson

WASHINGTON – The United States Senate’s 50-48 vote last week to repeal regulations that forbade...More>>

Upfronts: Cable Net Groups Say TV Goes Beyond Simple Data     29 Mar, 2017

News By: Doug McPherson

NEW YORK – Executives at two cable network groups told media buyers and advertisers at upfront...More>>

Comcast to Offer Online TV Nationwide     29 Mar, 2017

News By: Doug McPherson

PHILADELPHIA – Bloomberg News is reporting that Comcast Corp. has acquired rights from cable...More>>

AdSphere: DRTV’s Size Many Times Larger Than Previously Thought     29 Mar, 2017

News By: Doug McPherson

TEMECULA, Calif. – DRMetrix, the TV research company, says in a new study that the size of direct...More>>


DRMA Spotlight
DRMA Spotlight: Helping Clients and Employees Reach Their Dreams     1 Mar, 2017

Article By: Doug McPherson

In March 2006, Craig Handley and Tony Ricciardi teamed to create Listen Up Español, a call center...More>>